نمونه رایتینگهای (با نمره بالا) تسک دو آیلتس کتاب کمبریج 18
در زیر یک نمونه پاسخ به یک سوال موجود در کتاب تست کمبریج آکادمیک آیلتس 18 برای شما نوشتم که امیدوارم نهایت استفاده را از آنها ببرید. به زودی نمونه برای دیگر سوالات در این کتاب بارگذاری خواهند شد.
Cambridge 18, Test1
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Model Answer:
Test 1
I somewhat agree that the most crucial goal of scientific progress should be improving the human condition and enhancing people’s lives. However, I do not believe this should be the sole aim of scientific inquiry and there are other important pursuits for the scientific community.
On the one hand, much of scientific advancement throughout history has been motivated by the desire to solve pressing human problems and meet human needs. For instance, innovations in medicine have allowed us to treat diseases, extend the human lifespan, and improve public health. Advancements in transportation and communication technologies have connected people across vast distances and made the world more accessible. Even technologies born of scientific curiosity, like quantum mechanics or evolutionary theory, have ultimately been applied to modern medicine, computing, and other fields in ways that enrich people’s lives.
However, an equally important goal of science should be expanding the frontiers of human knowledge through open-ended research and experimentation. When scientists have the latitude to follow their curiosity and study topics without obvious applications, it often leads to discoveries that fuel entire new fields of study or industries. For example, studies in theoretical mathematics and physics have led to breakthrough discoveries that enabled nuclear energy, GPS satellites, cryptocurrencies, and more. If improving lives was the sole objective of science, we may not have explored and discovered foundational ideas, such as general relativity or electromagnetism.
In conclusion, while improving well-being and solving human challenges should remain a key aim of scientific progress, it should not be the only objective. Scientific discovery through open-ended research and curiosity-driven science is equally crucial. Balance is needed to ensure we continue gaining insights into both human nature and the nature of the universe. Overall, science should have the dual but equal aims of benefiting humanity and expanding knowledge.
Cambridge 18, Test2
Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Model Answer:
Test 2
Studying at a university can open new opportunities for a student. In addition to their main subjects, some students decide to explore subjects outside their main field of interest. Whereas, others think it is more essential to concentrate on one qualification. Both perspectives carry legitimate arguments, which need to be carefully analyzed before forming an opinion.
On one hand, students who advocate for an extensive learning approach argue that knowledge is interconnected. This viewpoint underscores the importance of a well-rounded education, where students can understand concepts from different disciplines, fostering their critical thinking and innovation skills. For instance, a Computer Science student might benefit from studying Psychology to understand user behavior better, thus improving their ability to create user-friendly software. Additionally, exposure to diverse fields can also prepare students for a dynamic job market where multidisciplinary skills are increasingly valued.
On the other hand, there are students who believe in focusing entirely on their main subject, arguing that this approach enables in-depth knowledge and mastery. This is particularly relevant in specialized fields such as Medicine or Engineering, where comprehensive understanding and proficiency are essential for effective practice. Furthermore, dedicating their time and energy to a single field allows students to delve into research and produce scholarly work, which could contribute significantly to their respective fields and possibly lead to innovative breakthroughs.
In conclusion, while some university students prefer to focus entirely on their main subject to gain a qualification, others find value in exploring various fields. In my opinion, both approaches have their merits, but in an increasingly complex world, requiring individuals to possess a diverse set of skills and knowledge, it is beneficial to strike a balance between depth and breadth in education. This would equip students with a robust knowledge base and versatile skills, preparing them for the diverse challenges and opportunities in their future careers.
